Thursday, December 16, 2010

Brzydula Streaming Online



Yin / Yang

The Chinese left dalla constatazione che la realtà che ci circonda è caratterizzata da una dualità: ad esempio l'alternanza del giorno con la notte, il caldo con il freddo, il buio con la luce, l'estate con l'inverno, il male con il bene....... La realtà cioè è costituita dalla complementarietà degli opposti: lo YIN e lo YANG. Essi interagiscono tra di loro e si trasformano l'uno nell'altro come accade per la materia e l'energia. Infatti la regolazione di tutti gli equilibri fisiologici avviene per mezzo di sistemi apparentemente in antagonismo (simpatico/parasimpatico, acidi e basi ecc...). L'antitesi di questi due termini può servire ad indicare tutte le realtà possibili. Tutto ciò che esiste al mondo può essere classificato Yin or yang. To understand the concept a little, we could say that generically the Yin is associated with cold, darkness, depth, low ... YANG while to warm the surface, the light, high ... To understand this duality analyze writing: both characters have in common is the part that is left, which means hill. In the next we YANG sun above the horizon that brings with it a jerky movement of flags as shaken by the wind. YIN for the sign to say that at this moment there are clouds in the sky running. The two characters represent two distinct phases of the same reality, ie express a concept of movement that is inherent in the DAO. DAO means: road, path, street, then follow the path that you do one thing, the method, principle, doctrine. In other words, the complex movements of the order of life that makes it that not a single leaf will be spared for its beauty, not a flower to its perfume when the autumn. However, the DAO is inexpressible, "the DAO can be stated that the DAO is not true" is beyond our comprehension. We can only guess through all its transformations first of all the YIN / YANG.
Yin and Yang are opposite
Yin and Yang are interdependent : Yin needs of Yang and vice versa, if there were one aspect, there is not even the other.
THERE 'A BALANCE IN THE YIN / YANG : when YIN YANG down the halls and vice versa.
YANG TO THE FULLEST EXTENT IT IS TRANSFORMED IN THE YIN AND VICE VERSA : YANG continue this because if there would be a rise in its separation.



          

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Morrowind V1.6.1820 No Cd

Thoughts on the short story "The Four Candles"


"Le quattro candele, bruciando, si consumavano lentamente.
Il luogo era talmente silenzioso,
che si poteva ascoltare la loro conversazione.

La prima diceva:
"IO SONO LA PACE,
ma gli uomini non mi vogliono:
penso proprio che non mi resti altro da fare
che spegnermi!"
Così fu e, a poco a poco, la candela si lasciò spegnere completamente.

La seconda disse:
"IO SONO LA FEDE
purtroppo non servo a nulla.
Gli uomini non ne vogliono sapere di me,
non ha senso che io resti accesa".
Appena ebbe terminato di parlare, una leggera brezza soffiò su di lei e la spense.

Sad sad, the third candle, in turn, said
"I AM THE LOVE
not have the strength to continue to stay on.
Men do not consider me
And do not understand my importance.
Too often prefer to hate!"
And without further ado, let the candle go out.

... A child at that time
entered the room and saw the three unlit candles.
"But what you do! You must be lit,
I'm afraid of the dark!"
And so saying he burst into tears.

Then the fourth candle, impietositasi said
"Do not be afraid, do not cry:
until I am on, we can always turn the other three candles
:
I AM THE HOPE "

With shining eyes and swollen with tears,
the child took the candle of Hope and lit the other.

THAT never go out
HOPE IN OUR HEART ...

... and that each of us can be
tool, as that child,
able at any moment to turn
with its hope,
Faith, Peace and Love. "


In these days have happened after the invitation of friendship in the Facebook Wall of the Centro Studi Bhaktivedanta (center professes that one of the many branches of Hinduism). I did, then the personal reflections on the story, which have been unpopular, so that I have cancellato dall'amicizia. Pazienza. Credo, però, che queste riflessioni siano importanti per arrivare alla pace e all'amore mondiale e che quindi contengono un messaggio di SPERANZA.

LE MIE RIFLESSIONI

Il problema principale è, a mio avviso, proprio la FEDE quando si trasforma in integralismo religioso e genera da decine di millenni i conflitti (il problema non cambia se alcune persone, per fini di potere, di conquista o di altro, usano le religioni per alimentare divisioni e conflitti).
Ho ricordato che nonostante tutti i propositi di buona volontà, Ghandi fu assassinato da un altro induista, e ancora nella stessa India persiste il conflitto (visibile o latente) nel Kashmir e il problema Sikh separatists. The religious conflicts in other parts of the world, are no different and remember, symbolically, the martyrs of Al Qaeda, which touch more closely.

There is a solution to the problem?
The new vision of reality given by the network of unconscious (see www.inconsci.blogspot.com), as some scholars say is the most unique and revolutionary in the world there is a real gift to humanity . This new view shows consistent and makes a sound conclusion, that if we are helped by the latest scientific and spiritual traditions from thousands of years, is able to offer hope, without a good price.

As is well explained in the place of Richard Calantropio: http://nuoveteorie.blogspot.com/2010/10/la-grande-intelligenza-collettiva-dei.html

NETWORK OF UNCONSCIOUS The mechanism is the basis DETECTION AND LIGHTS large that some people get in their own unconscious (The old masters Hindu, Tao, Buddha, Moses, Zoroaster, Mani, Muhammad, Jung, etc.)..

These "lights" are the result of unconscious interactions of many people (even whole nations) that use individual knowledge and collectively develop new visions of reality. This explains the multiplicity of the thousands of religions and esoteric cults, often with conflicting teachings, but in any case different.


If all men, irrespective of religion, conquisterranno this knowledge will not continue to profess their faith (which is an unconscious mechanism, similar to the placebo effect, makes it almost real, even in the effect of the prayers in deep meditations and rituals that affect their unconscious and others).

However, when the theological interpretations (including doctrines and dogmas) will go against reason (or against universal individual rights and universal selfless love, without knowing that we are all one community that the network itself convidar UNCONSCIOUS and the same planet, and if we do evil that comes back and affects us), we need to step back and admit that our perceptions and interpretations (or those of our teachers) are incorrect, or manipulated for selfish purposes.
only way to defuse the great importance of religion in conflicts, conflicts that can only continue to self-interest of a few, easily identifiable and distinguishable.


To implement this, however, it is imperative that already believers in the religions that preach peace, love and hope, to admit publicly that beyond individual interpretations of what they believe, there are rights universal humanity and that can not be used, never and under no circumstances, an excuse to act in the name of God against other men. Only in this way, the fundamentalist fringes of some religions can be isolated and condemned. But if we believe that the problem affects only others and not ourselves, and we will not be the first to lead by example, committing an act of pride that will prevent you from arriving at a single true community and true peace.

Peace and hope for all.

Alessandra

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Tiffany Towers Iphone

Control of errors in quantum computers in the network and the possible impact of the unconscious.


From an article in SCIENCE of September 30, 2010: Member of overlap



Control of errors in quantum computers


The entangled state of three objects had already been made with photons and charged particles, but this is the first time that you get in a solid state device A group of researchers at Yale University was able to obtain for the first time a state entanglement of three qubits in solid form, perform an essential step to achieve these indipensabili random checks of possible errors in future quantum computers.

"The entanglement between three objects had been found so far with photons and charged particles. But this is the first time that you get in a solid state device that looks and behaves like a conventional processor," said Steven Girvin, paretcipato that the study now published in the pages of Nature. Last year was the first time developed a rudimentary first solid-state quantum processor that had proved unable to perform simple algorithm with two qubits.

In the new study, researchers were able to obtain, with a success rate of 88 percent of the attempts made, a state of placing the three-qubit entanglement in a state of superposition of two possibilities, in all three state 0, or all three in state 1. The particular state of entanglement thus obtained demonstrates for the first time the possibility to encode the quantum information of a single qubit through the so-called three-qubit repetition code: "This is the first step towards quantum error correction, as in a classical computer that takes advantage of extra qubits to allow the computer to operate correctly even in the presence of occasional errors," said Girvin.

Errors of this type may be due, exemplifies Girvin, for example by cosmic rays that can convert a qubit from 0 to 1 or vice versa. Replicating the qubit, the computer is able to check if all three are in the same state, as they should.

"Error correction is a kind of holy grail of quantum computing today, and it can be realized requires a minimum of three qubits. So what made it exciting step," said Schoelkopf, which led the research. (Gg)

----------------------

If we now imagine that the NETWORK OF UNCONSCIOUS (see: www.inconsci.blogspot.com) communicate with "state of entanglement" (non-local Quantum Mechanics), we can assume that such errors also occur in the communications network and this would help explain many incorrect interpretations of what is received on a subconscious level (Which should not happen if all spiritual or metaphysical).

Friday, September 3, 2010

Driver Licaense Renew Method Ohio Columbus

Hawking: "It was God who created the universe," Dark matter



The theory of the scientist in the new book "The Big Bang is derived only from the laws of physics." Many reactions of theologians, after this announcement, on the eve of the visit of Pope

From an article in "La Repubblica" on 03 September 2010:

LONDON - The world needs a Creator? "No". The peremptory answer comes from Professor Stephen Hawking, the world's most famous astrophysicist, considered by many the heir of Newton, which has as it inherited the prestigious chair at Cambridge University. In a new book coming out these days, the author of international best-seller From the Big Bang to support blacks holes, based on new theories, that "the universe may have created by themselves, may have been created from nothing" and therefore "God did not create it."

His statement yesterday occupied the entire front page of the Times of London, as a challenge, yet another, science to religion. "Just as Darwin has denied the existence of God with his theory of biological evolution of our species," said Richard Dawkins, biologist defender of atheism, "Hawking denies it now from the point of view of physics." In his most famous book, the astrophysicist had tried to explain what happened "before" the Big Bang, or the time before he was born, leaving the question unresolved. The final chapter contains an argument that some interpreted as the idea that God is not incompatible with a scientific understanding of the universe: discovering what was there before Big Bang, to reach a "complete theory" of the Universe - Hawking wrote - "would be the greatest triumph of human reason, because at that point to know the mind of God."

But in his new work, titled The Grand Design (The grand design or project) and co-written with American physicist Leonard Mlodinow, the scientist gives the answer: instead of being an unlikely event, be explained only by divine intervention, the Big Bang was "an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics." Hawking writes: "Since there is a law like gravity, the universe and may have been created by myself, from scratch. The spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something instead of nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. "In the book, the researcher also predicts that physics is close to formulate a" theory of everything ", a series of equations that can fully explain the properties of nature The discovery considered the Holy Grail of physics since Einstein.

E 'However, his assertion that God created the universe, and therefore does not exist, to raise economic and controversy. "If one has faith," says Professor George Ellis, professor of applied mathematics at the University of Cape Town, "will continue to believe that God created the Earth, the Universe, or at least turn on the light, to trigger the mechanism that has put everything in motion, before Big Bang or alleged anything that preceded it. "But the field of atheism welcomes the publication of the book by Hawking as a victory of reason and science, to be celebrated two weeks after the visit to England by Pope Benedict XVI, who will not be strongly disagree with Hawking.

In the new book, astrophysicist reveals that the reference to "the mind of God" in his previous volume on the Big Bang had been misinterpreted. Hawking has never believed that science and religion were compatible . There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, and science, which is based on observation and reasoning, "he says." And the science will win because it works. "


my remarks.
The universe requires a Creator? "NO" is also my answer, but this does not exclude that there might be a God, the great architect who has designed and set in motion the universe came out of the BIG BANG, or vice versa has created what existed before the Big Bang and which led to the Big Bang itself. And I do not think anyone will ever prove the existence or nonexistence of God
Certainly not the God described in the Bible, which operates in several stages or more stages (there is written that the creation occurred in six days and the seventh day he rested). As rightly said Stephen Hawkins everything is linked and is a logical consequence of the laws of physics (without interventions such deus ex machina that modify the processes already in place).
This means that there was a wizard, let alone in biological evolution, but free to develop according to the laws of physics, chemistry and biology.

As he said the founder of my school of thought even in his post of March 24, 2009:
http://nuoveteorie.blogspot.com/2009/03/luomo-era-in-un-progetto-intelligente.html

MAN WAS IN AN INTELLIGENT DESIGN OF GOD?
The problem posed by Pope Benedict XVI in Regensburg has its hub in genetic mutations, random and selected pure environment for the evolutionists, and the second predetermined Pope Eric Kandel, Nobel 2000, as a conceptual framework of five points, said (like many other scientists) that the genetic mutations are random and selected by the environment.

also one of the principles of quantum mechanics (The acausal ') is in support of this thesis (Besides Einstein coined the famous phrase "God does not play dice," Bohr and his friend replied, "Stop telling God Einstein what to do !"... to which Feynman said: "Not only does God play dice, but he throws them where we can not see them).

All this has nothing to do with the so-called "CHAOS", also because the meccanica quantistica sappiamo che esiste il NON LOCALISMO. Il fenomeno nasce con il teorema e la diseguaglianza di Bell, verificato sperimentalmente da Aspect e Al, che mise fine alla lunga disputa tra Bohr e Einstein sulla validità e interpretazione della meccanica quantistica. Il teorema di Bell afferma la non separabilità di alcune entità fisiche (Questo ha comportato uno sconvolgimento drammatico del metodo analitico e riduzionista occidentale). In pratica si afferma che due sistemi quantistici che hanno interagito almeno una volta non possono essere più separati, e alcune delle variabili fisiche (ad esempio gli SPIN) saranno sempre connesse tra di loro anche se i due sistemi quantistici vengono separati a distanze di miliardi di anni luce. Questo dimostra che nell'universo esistono delle connessioni significative che possono essere definite come sincroniche. Quando, ad esempio, un osservatore misura uno spin in una certa direzione automaticamente e simultaneamente lo spin della seconda particella si orienta nella direzione opposta. Questo avviene in modo istantaneo, senza la trasmissione di alcun segnale che dovrebbe sottostare, per il principio di relatività, a non superare la velocità della luce. Tutto questo può avere delle implicazioni inimmaginabili, dal momento che tutta la materia è fatta di particelle elementari che seguono le leggi della meccanica quantistica e che la materia di tutto l'universo era inizialmente, alla sua nascita, situata in una piccola zona di spazio (dalle dimensioni di una tennis ball, which then exploded in the Big Bang). From here it is very likely that all matter exists in the cosmos was once connected, and therefore, for the inseparability of Bell's theorem, it is still connected.
In conclusion, the "metaphysics synchronicity" of CG Jung might be more realistic than you think, and all the world and 10 to the 500 parallel universes (according to M theory of superstrings) could be synchronized with each other, but in a way that we can not detect.

God definitely play dice, but perhaps they are loaded dice, because there is a synchronicity or at least non-local, and this throws them where we can not see them. If

to this consideration we add a second, meaning that all subatomic particles (called strings), or bricks of the Universe, there are a limited number of types is possible, even in that HAD SOME intelligent design of God in a world of our and other parallel universes evolve sooner or later, biological beings endowed with reason and abstraction (ie, the image and likeness of God, according to the biblical concept).


This means that there has been a project manager, who HAS made changes to the initial design work in progress, so the Catholic theology of Pope Benedict XVI will come out of certain defeat, but there is nothing to prevent stato un DIO CREATORE che si sia limitato a dare l’INPUT iniziale a un progetto che, pur libero nella sua casualità, si sviluppasse secondo dei canoni DEFINITI e non INDEFINITI. Per fare un’ANALOGIA, nel gioco degli scacchi, il numero delle mosse possibili è altissimo, ma sempre limitato, e un computer del domani le potrebbe prevedere tutte e non perdere mai. Inoltre, anche partendo da tutta una serie di mosse diverse, le combinazioni dei pezzi sulla scacchiera spessissimo si ripetono (per analogia, in uno,o più, dei quasi infiniti pianeti dell'universo, può nascere o attecchire la vita, anche partendo da condizioni iniziali diverse). E qui c'è l'IMMENSA BELLEZZA E POTENZA DEL POSSIBILE GRANDE DISEGNO DI DIO: A world free to evolve, but contemporanemante reached sooner or later, and with different paths, designs budgeted (including biological intelligent and rational beings).

Meanwhile, according to the latest scientific knowledge about our universe, thanks to dark energy, is constantly expanding, so is ruled out a subsequent re-concentration of matter and a subsequent big bang. This universe will die slowly, perhaps in a few hundred billion years. And so it falls to the theory of the infinite cycle of Big Bang theory, which could exclude a Creator God.

Best wishes
Alessandra

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Mathematica 5.2 For Mac Rar






The concept of dark matter makes sense only within the current Big Bang cosmology based on, because we do not know how to explain otherwise have been able to form galaxies and galaxy clusters in such a short time like that observed. Not also explain how galaxies, in addition to form, remain intact even if the visible matter, composed of baryons, can not develop enough gravity for this purpose. Even from this perspective, the concept of dark matter makes sense only within the current Standard Model, in which the sole cosmological gravitational force, if the Standard Model is incorrect, there would be need for dark matter, since there there is no experimental evidence if not violations of a mathematical model.

Despite detailed maps of 'near Universe, covering the electromagnetic spectrum from radio waves to gamma rays, we were able to identify only 10% of its mass, as stated in 2001 at the New York Times by Bruce H. Margon, an astronomer at the University of Washington:

"The situation is somewhat embarrassing to admit that we can not find 90 percent of [the matter] of the Universe. "


The latest measurements indicate that dark matter constitutes about 23% of the universe and about 85% by mass.

was initially indicated as "missing mass", even if there is indeed matter, as they are observable gravitational effects of its mass. However, this matter does not emit any electromagnetic radiation and is therefore not detectable by means of spectroscopic analysis, from which the adjective "dark". The missing mass term can be misleading, since it is not the missing mass, but its light.

Dark matter is not to be confused with the different situation that goes by the name of dark energy.

An important observational evidence of the need for dark matter was given by the rotation curves of spiral galaxies. These galaxies contain a large population of stars placed on nearly circular orbits around the galactic center. As with planetary orbits, according to Kepler's third law with galactic orbits the stars should have larger orbital velocities smaller, but Kepler's third law applies only to nearby stars in the outskirts of a spiral galaxy, because it assumes that the mass enclosed by the orbit is constant. However, astronomers have conducted observations of orbital velocities of stars in the outlying regions of a large number of spiral galaxies, and in any case they follow Kepler's third law. Instead of decreasing at larger radii, the orbital velocities remain constant with very good approximation. The implication is that the mass enclosed by orbits of greater radius gradually increases, even for stars that are apparently close to the edge of the galaxy. Although they are at the boundaries of the bright part of the galaxy, it has a mass profile that apparently continues well beyond the regions occupied by stars.

Considering the stars at the outskirts of a spiral galaxy, with orbital velocities typically observed of 200 kilometers per second, if the galaxy were made only by the visible matter in these stars would drop in the short time since their orbital speeds are four times larger than the escape velocity from the galaxy. Given that there are no galaxies that are dispersing in this way, inside should be the mass of which are taken into account when adding up all the visible parts.


gravitational lens in a group of galaxies. On August 21, 2006, NASA issued a press release that Chandra would have found direct evidence of dark matter in the collision between two galaxy clusters. In early 2007, astronomers of the Cosmic Evolution Survey and Hubble Space Telescope, using the information obtained by the Hubble telescope and ground-based instruments, have drawn a map of dark matter noting that permeates the universe is matter where This should be visible even large amounts of dark matter, but that is also present in areas where there is visible matter.
assumptions about dark matter.
appeared in the literature several theories to explain the missing mass associated with different phenomena.

The dark mass is divided into baryonic and non baryonic:

baryonic dark matter is composed of material similar to that which constitutes stars, planets, interstellar dust, etc.., But does not emit radiation;
non-baryonic dark matter is composed of matter intrinsically different and not yet discovered. It is hypothesized that it may be supersymmetric particles such as neutralinos, or massive neutrinos or axions, or other particles ever observed, and subject only to gravitational interaction and nuclear weak. This material is called WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), large particles of unit mass baryonic weakly interacting with matter, and therefore difficult to detect. Three types of experiments trying to detect these particles: i) producing them in particle accelerators ii) seeing the energy that should be issued when colliding with ordinary matter, iii) annihilation of particles of dark matter present around the center of the galaxy or sun could make ordinary particles such as neutrinos, positrons, anti-protons.
currently is thought that at least 90% of non-baryonic dark matter is. In fact, the cosmic abundance of deuterium, which is a deuterium atom for every 100,000 hydrogen is extremely sensitive to the density of matter in the form of baryons. A baryonic density greater abundance of deuterium would mean much lower. Instead, the observed abundance of deuterium is compatible with the density of observable matter.

The discovery that the neutrino has mass, albeit very low, which may partly explain the excess mass of the clusters and superclusters of galaxies, but not that of individual galaxies, because it moves at a speed near that of light, escaping sooner or later the gravitational pull in and out of them.

Other possible constituents of dark matter have been identified in the MACHO (Massive Compact Halo Objects), compact objects of great mass of the halo galactic primordial blacks in the holes in the soliton stars, the stars of bosons and the quark nuggets.


To the question of the previous post brings us to the fact "if Newton was wrong or not." A physicist friend of mine has a theory on that has a certain charm.

We know from previous posts, that when a body is free to float in space time NOT affected by a severe ', but is subject only to the curvature of space, while it is prevented from freely floating (as it's spot Earth's surface) the seriousness reappears. Now it is true that if is visible matter should also be large amounts of dark matter and dark matter is probably made up largely of supersymmetric particles such as neutralinos, or massive neutrinos or axions, or other particles ever observed, and subject only to the gravitational force and weak nuclear interaction, we can imagine that:
dark matter is a kind of gas of subatomic particles floating in space-time with all the other bodies may do so.
In this case, its large mass cancel out the effects of gravity by Newton, and an astronaut in space does not suffer from the effects because free-floating along with this kind of gas that surrounds. Conversely, if a man or an object is constrained in its movements (such as the Earth's surface), would have a significant effect of dark matter and would be the dominant force of gravity.

According to this theory, Newton was not wrong, but its laws can only apply where it has a decisive influence on the dark, free-floating in space time.

Obviously the theory of my friend does not fall within the M theory of superstrings, which in any case, it is still to be proved, even if it is the most likely today.

Best wishes
Alessandra

Women Bottomless Clips

Newton was wrong? Gravity does not exist?


In the United States has reopened the debate on the principles formulated by the famous scientist with the work of a Dutch physicist: "His theory is an illusion." This is Erik Verlinde hypothesis that links his criticisms of string and the holographic universe.

From an article on the Republic of July 15, 2010:

The theory of gravity is perhaps the most formidable law of physics, the most obvious and universal principle because it corresponds to an empirical irresistible. The child still can not talk and one of the first games in which amuses the chair, is to drop the spoon of jelly. The show is fascinating in its repetitiveness. Grab a spoon, lifting it up, drop it, and each time the miracle is repeated: that object is irresistibly attracted to the ground, forcing the patient's parent to pick it up. Each of us at the age of 18 months without knowing it was Newton. Well, ricrediamoci: the force of gravity is an illusion, a cosmic joke, or a "side effect" of something else that occurs to a much deeper level of reality.

The abandonment of Newton had already been anticipated by the relativity of Albert Einstein but now takes a more radical break. A famous Dutch-American mathematical physicist, the 48 year old Erik Verlinde, which has already linked its name to "string theory" (Supersymmetry in parallel universes), is shaking the U.S. academic world with a series of lectures in which he breaks down the theory of gravity. From Harvard to Berkeley, my fellow scientists are taking very seriously. His new vision it can throw a different light on some of the major themes of contemporary physics: the so-called dark energy (dark energy), a sort of anti-gravity that appears to accelerate the expansion of the universe, or "dark matter" that supposedly holds the galaxies together.

Andrew Strominger, a physicist-mathematician at Harvard, is one of the co-Verlinde who does not hide his admiration: "These ideas are inspiring very interesting discussions, vanno dritte al cuore di tutto ciò che non comprendiamo del nostro universo". Verlinde è l'ultimo di una serie di scienziati che da trent'anni a questa parte stanno smantellando pezzo dopo pezzo la teoria della gravità. Negli anni Settanta Jacob Bekenstein e Stephen Hawking hanno esplorato i legami tra i buchi neri e la termodinamica. Negli anni Novanta Ted Jacobson ha illustrato i buchi neri come degli ologrammi, le immagini tridimensionali usate per la sicurezza delle nostre carte di credito: tutto ciò che è stato "inghiottito" ed è sparito dentro i buchi neri dell'universo, è presente come un'informazione stampata nell'ologramma, sulla superficie esterna. Juan Maldacena dell'"Institute for Advanced Study" ha costruito un modello mathematical universe expressed as a tin of canned soup. Everything that happens inside the jar, including what we call gravity, is synthesized in the label pasted outside: outside instead of gravity does not exist.

think the universe as a box of Scrabble (the Beetle, ed), the game where you make words with the letters of the alphabet. If you shake the box and the letters scattered at random, there is only one possible combination that can give you a poem of Leopardi. An almost infinite number of combinations have no meaning. More shake the box of letters is more likely that the disorder increases as the letters combine in order of probability. This is the new way of seeing the force of gravity, as a form of entropy. Or a "side effect of the natural tendency towards disorder." If it is not clear what will replace it, and yet we are far from imagining the possible practical applications, Verlinde is adamant on one point: "The emperor has no clothes. For some time it was understood that gravity does not exist. Now is the time to scream. "


We read that the abandonment of Newton had already been anticipated by the relativity of Albert Einstein. Let's see why:

From the site: http://www.racine.ra.it/planet/testi/gravit2.htm

"In 1905, an unknown physicist who worked at the patent office in Bern had passed suddenly from obscurity to fame, his name was Albert Einstein. In three articles that appeared in a prestigious physics journal, the young Einstein completely revolutionized the concepts space and time by showing that space and time are not static and absolute as Newton claimed, but are dynamic and relative. In other words, space can shrink or expand the time and can expand or shrink depending on the state of motion of the observer; Furthermore, space and time are intimately tied together so much so that scientists no longer speak of space and time but to space-time.

After these first efforts Einstein began to think about gravity, trying to develop a new theory that would allow to overcome the difficulties that we mentioned earlier.

In 1908, a trivial incident helped to put the scientist on the right track: a painter fell from a roof and fell to the floor, luckily for him (but not its only) survive. Just heard the news Einstein went to the hospital to visit the victim to know what was tried in the fall, the man told him that during the fall he had felt completely weightless, as if gravity were temporarily gone. Because the painter had not felt the gravity?

Surely we have all seen those wonderful television pictures where you see the crew of the Space Shuttle in orbit, floating freely in weightlessness. Imagine then an astronaut inside a spacecraft orbiting the Earth, man is weightless, floating freely, and if he rolls a ball in front of him, the ball moves along a straight line. If we bring the astronaut with his spaceship on Earth's surface we see that things are very different, and the man feels something that keeps him attached to the floor of the spacecraft launches and if the usual ball in front of him this fall on the ground following a curved path . We explain these phenomena are talking about gravity. But the usual demand continues to hum in the brain, because when the astronaut is in space, like dell'imbianchino not feel gravity? Not sure why the influence of the Earth in space is negligible, as sometimes we hear in the media, on the contrary, even in space influence the Earth is very strong (he knows something about the Moon for more than four billion years from the Earth's gravity is imprisoned and forced to turn around our planet). What then is the difference between space and Earth's surface?

There is a big difference: the earth's surface prevents alla navicella e all’astronauta di fluttuare liberamente e, in questo caso, appare la gravità. Ormai sentiamo di essere vicini alla soluzione del mistero.

Immaginiamo un ulteriore esperimento: supponiamo di essere all’interno di una casetta sulla superficie terrestre e di lanciare davanti a noi la solita pallina; la pallina cade sul pavimento dopo un certo tempo seguendo una traiettoria curva. Come al solito noi spieghiamo questo fenomeno invocando la forza di gravità. A questo punto cambiamo le carte in tavola; supponiamo che, nell’istante esatto in cui viene lanciata la pallina, sotto la casetta si faccia improvvisamente il vuoto. Di conseguenza la casetta viene a trovarsi in caduta libera, cioè in libera fluttuazione. Now, compared to the lodge, the points of departure and arrival of the ball and the time taken to travel distance are exactly the same but something else has changed the trajectory has become straight.

In other words, the gravity is gone!

is the great insight of Einstein gravity does not exist, gravity is an illusion. They are right to say that the painter astronaut does not feel gravity because gravity does not exist, it appears as if by magic, when, for whatever reason (in our case due to the Earth's surface), is interrupted the natural movement of free float.

Freedom fluctuation is the natural movement of the body, it is controlled and governed directly from space. Typically, when it comes to space, we tend to think of something blank, nothing, in reality, the space is imagined as a kind of elastic tissue can deform (like that used in those platforms where the children, and not, have fun jumping). Usually space is flat and straight but bodies follow trajectories in the presence of matter curves space.

At this point it quickly becomes clear why, for example, the Earth rotates around the sun or because the moon revolves around the Earth. The Earth rotates around our Sun, the star not because it attracts a mysterious force we call gravity, but because the Sun, because of its large mass, curves the surrounding space, and this curvature is transmitted up to very large distances. Consequently, the Earth, moving in a curved space, nothing can be done to follow a curved trajectory. The same applies to the Moon.

Summing up the union between space and matter can be expressed with the following sentence: space tells matter how to move, matter tells space how to bend.

This conception of gravity, Einstein published in 1916 and known as the Theory of General Relativity, shows a beauty, a simplicity and elegance above all that unbelievable. Instead of being faced with a scientific theory seems to have anything to do with a Beethoven symphony or a Strauss waltz. "


Recall that in general relativity, the gravitational interaction is generated by the curvature of spacetime created by the presence of bodies with mass or energy, and is expected to be propagated by means of gravitational radiation, a wave phenomenon that does not require any material medium to propagate in space, traveling at the speed of light. The gravitational field is a field tensor, represented mathematically by a metric tensor, related to the curvature of space-time through the Riemann tensor.

In originale su "La repubblica" non vi erano nel titolo i punti interrogativi, che ho voluto aggiungere, e nel prossimo POST, vi spiegherò il perchè di questa mia scelta.

Un caro saluto

Alessandra

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

“dressing Room De Manah Depauw

The nineteen new ideas of science according to the quantum physicist Michael Brooks


Il fisico quantistico Michael Brooks elenca le teorie più interessanti (e affascinanti) degli ultimi anni. Da un articolo su "IL POST" del 17 agosto 2010.

Michael Brooks è un fisico inglese che si occupa di meccanica quantistica. Collabora con la rivista New Scientist e ha scritto per il Guardian, l’Observer, l’Independent. Ha tenuto conferenze all’Università di New York, al Museo Americano di Storia Nature and the University of Cambridge, and regularly takes part in a BBC radio program 6, which explains (or tries to) the mysteries of the universe. New Statesman wrote a list of nineteen new ideas of science - or old ideas that have made progress. The realization of any of these theories seems to close and we can already see the horizon, others seem to still science fiction. Obviously things are often more detailed and complex as are described, and all deserve more and more precise investigations to be described in full. The intention to Brooks, however, is purely layman's goal is reached: the story of how science is changing is very fascinating, even for those without adequate preparation behind.

Humans are still evolving
We do not realize it because it happens slowly, but our genetic code is still evolving. Two examples: the presence of a gene that increases fertility is increasing in Europe, while to digest lactose is spreading from eastern Europe to the world. And of course there are the changes in reaction to disease. People with a particular genetic code are more likely to survive malaria and HIV, and almost all humans are losing the caspase gene, because it makes it more vulnerable alle infezioni batteriche.

Il tempo non esiste
C’è un problema nella coesistenza delle teorie che gli scienziati stanno formulando per arrivare a una “teoria del tutto”: il tempo, che in ognuna di queste teorie funziona in modo diverso. Nella relatività non viene misurato mentre nella teoria dei quanti non si prende nemmeno in considerazione il fatto che questo debba venire misurato. La soluzione radicale al problema è considerare il tempo come una cosa che gli esseri umani si sono inventati, per nulla fondamentale e definita nei processi dell’universo.

Questo è solo uno dei tanti universi
Ci sono cose del nostro universo che sembrano essere così and that's it. It is not known what depends the value of the force of gravity, and this would not be a problem if the value is not the perfect one to allow life to our universe, almost as if someone had decided to table. But since this is clearly an explanation that scientists are not fond of, have suggested another solution: our universe is just one of many - all different from each other - among which we can not move. This would eliminate the "special" conditions of the universe: it is clear that is perfect for us, otherwise we would not be here to see it.

We may be able to stop aging
experiments on different animals such as mice and worms, have shown that blocking or modifying genes can be very slow the rate of aging. And there are less technical ways to do this: to follow special diets or injection of hormones in the body could lead to the same result. The question is of course one of the most controversial in science, but we do not have to worry yet for some, many biologists say that it is still a mirage, and say that we will never counteract cell death. The fight against aging is still gone from "impossible" to "enormously difficult".

They're coming men stepped
Among a generation or two human beings have a choice to make: whether or not to enhance their children? A group of scientists led by Raymond Kurzweil argues that we are entering an era where it will host the Singularity, when our mental and physical abilities can be improved with the use of technology. The research is obviously started with the intent to prevent the emergence of diseases, but were soon extended to overcome our limits: plants in the retina to improve vision or the brain to enhance memory. And the diagnosis of the genetic code of the embryos in vitro damage is already possible to select children che possano poi donare a fratelli malati; da qui a selezioni più specifiche il passo è breve.

Tutto è informazione
L’universo potrebbe essere una semplicissima ma sterminata rete di “atomi d’informazione”. Allo stesso modo del codice binario con cui lavora un computer, i processi della natura potrebbe essere stabiliti da decisioni che hanno come risposte possibili unicamente il sì e il no: “Il fotone passa per questo punto?”. E così via. L’universo sarebbe quindi un gigante sistema informatico, una visione che semplificherebbe e renderebbe comprensibile il modo con cui funzionano le cose.

Comprendere la nostra coscienza non è più a dream
The increasing knowledge of our brain and the computer models could be designed to slowly reveal how it is possible that spongy stuff in our head creates our consciousness of human beings. In particular, observing the consequences of the death of little bits of brain that biologists are trying to understand how it works: depression, schizophrenia and autism are diseases that result from the destruction of small parts of the brain, and studying them could lead us to understand our operation . It might take a hundred years, but it is very likely that the journey is able to discover many interesting things.

We do not know what it is composed of the most dell’universo
L’universo è in buona parte formato da qualcosa che non riusciamo a comprendere. Secondo la nostra concezione delle cose, le galassie girano troppo velocemente per riuscire a tenere aggregate le stelle di cui sono composte. Ma, dato che quelle galassie compatte lo sono, significa che deve esistere qualcosa di extra gravitazionale che le tiene al loro posto. Gli scienziati chiamano questo qualcosa materia oscura, che dovrebbe formare circa un quarto della massa dell’universo. I restanti tre quarti sono formati invece da energia oscura, che spinge l’espansione dell’universo. Riguardo alla materia oscura, gli scienziati sono ancora parecchio confusi: sanno quali sono i suoi effetti, ma non sanno né where it comes from or what it is composed: it is therefore necessary that the dark matter particles should indicate that we have not yet discovered, and this is the objective which is pointing to the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva. With regard to dark energy, scientists have made even worse: we only know that does not come from either unknown or particles from space that exists between them.

We may be closer to understanding the mass
The excitement of the physicists of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in Geneva is linked to the possibility of discovering the Higgs boson - also called God particle - the only proof that we do not have to demonstrate the best theories of particle physics. The Higgs boson would have to exert a force on particles of some girls, so it becomes mass, the properties of matter responds to gravity and other external forces. What will happen at Cern is crucial: if the Higgs would be discovered the theory is confirmed, but if this does not happen would doubt a good portion of the beliefs of science.

ready aliens
is increasingly likely that our generation is the one that will find life on another planet. Of course, no intelligent life but microbes, and apologize if it is short. With technology advancing more and more velocemente, ogni anno si scoprono decine e decine di nuovi pianeti fuori dal nostro sistema solare, e i mezzi di rilevamento (fotografico e non) in grado di individuare la presenza di vita su un pianeta stanno migliorando. Se trovassimo organismi viventi su un altro pianeta sarebbe evidentemente una scoperta epocale, significherebbe che esiste più di un’evoluzione possibile nell’universo. Scienziati e filosofi stanno già discutendo su cosa dovremmo fare in caso di una scoperta del genere.

Gli esseri umani non sono speciali
Finora i ricercatori hanno trovato solo tre geni che appartengono esclusivamente agli esseri umani. Altri primati hanno le cellule del cervello identiche alle nostre, quello che sappiamo fare in most of them is just an evolved version of their "tricks." Chimps show morality, elephants empathy. Ravens use objects, dolphins have cultural communities, including the salamanders have different characters from each other. No one uses language as us, but the actions of the bonobos and orang-tango we are very close. In conclusion: we are the first class, but we are in another class.

believers are born
neuroscientific experiments have shown that we are naturally inclined to believe in invisible entities. The human brain has evolved assuming a living explanation for any phenomenon, we are descendants of tens of generations that, if behind a bush on the move did not see a predator, instinctively felt the presence of an evil spirit.

Most of the Earth is unexplored
It is likely that there are still many things that we do not know of our own planet. The ocean covers 70 percent of the planet and has an average depth of 4 km. Most are still unexplored, and every time that researchers take to discover new species and new deep geological formations, forcing scientists to reconsider their studies on the conditions that can lead to life.

The Tree of Life is a network
Before we imagine the tree of life as a series of branches that spread to other branches, with the foundation of all one common ancestor. Now instead we have realized that the evolution of life is more complicated than that: the animals do not evolve by creating new branches, but moving from branch to branch, ie forming a network. This means that biology is faced with an interesting future, which will no longer be confined to categorize the species and understand natural selection, but to analyze the mechanisms of nature and their unpredictability.

There is more than one way to get to the final theory
What they are focusing a lot of physical theories is a theory, something short that encloses the explanation for all phenomena. For years the most popular theory was that the strings, trying to explain the world with vibrations of rings of energy, but now other physicists have started to offer other theories. The loop quantum gravity, discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity, the quantum graphity, all theories will be tested in the coming years.

You can do important experiments in small workshops
It was found that the particles in liquid crystals and helium bubbles follow the same laws of some of the fundamental particles in nature. This makes them ideal to simulate large systems, replacing so huge, hyper-technological equipment of physicists. This means that in future scientists working in small laboratories in the basement will undertake work and projects similar to those of their more famous colleagues, work on expensive particle accelerators.

The revolution has arrived graphene
The lead of a pencil will change the future of the electronics industry. Or rather, the discovery that Andre Geim made in 2004 by analyzing the left graphite pencil on paper. Geim discovered that the paper had been a monoatomic layer (ie only one atom thick) of carbon atoms linked with each hexagon. The following tests have shown that that graphene has extraordinary properties: it is ten times stronger than steel and used as a conductor, the street loses a lot less energy than a medium used by computer chip today. When it is refined production, will be used to build transistors that consume little energy. What's more, graphene is also transparent to light, which makes its use ideal in optical fibers and systems to which they relate. Researchers are already working on telecommunications, televisions and solar panels based on graphene.

Language is the key thought
In the sixties Noam Chomsky formulated the idea that all human languages \u200b\u200bare based on settings del cervello già presenti alla nascita. Negli ultimi anni, diverse ricerche etnografiche hanno tentato invece di dimostrare che non è così, spiegando che nulla è pre-programmato. Il modo di pensare delle diverse culture e il loro linguaggio sarebbero legati indissolubilmente, e uno influenzerebbe l’altro.

Gli origami di DNA potrebbero cambiare il mondo
Sembra una ricetta culinaria: prendete qualche centinaia di stringhe di DNA, alteraratele chimicamente e legatele in punti diversi. Poi unitele tutte e usate qualsiasi tecnica disponibile per far sì che quei legami funzionino. Alla base del DNA origami c’è la volontà di costruire macchine e computer molto più piccoli di quelli attuali, right through the construction of nanostructures formed by bonds of DNA.

Personally, I would add to these, a twentieth idea, although that has not yet met the 100% approval of the international scientific community, is fueling an interesting debate, and I am referring to the fact that according to Erik Verlinde, a olandele famous scientist, whose name is linked to M theory of superstrings, "The Newtonian gravity does not exist, his theory is an illusion." And on that topic I made the following post of 09/02/2010.

Best wishes

Alessandra

Friday, July 30, 2010

I-catcher-console Web Monitor

La morte sospesa

Joe Simpson

If you have already seen the movie do not buy the book.
It 's like the film again at the speed of reading. Foregone conclusion.
This is probably because the film accurately reflects the history told in this book with meticulous precision.
If you have not seen the film is a book that perhaps deserves to be read.
I say why do not you deserve a book that involves any action was carried out as described and that sometimes you do not see the time it ended, almost taken for granted at times.
But maybe it's just the thought of someone who had seen the film and knew the ending .... The Lichens

Necklace # 1



Thursday, July 29, 2010

South Park Episodes On Quicktime Streaming

Aforismi (tema noia)

Boredom is unable to enjoy.
Gervase, Roberto

Boredom comes from not even knowing what not to do.
Gervase, Roberto

If the monkeys were able to feel bored, they could become men.
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang

Boredom is a kind of longing for a perfect pleasure.
Kant, Immanuel

Boredom is an invention of those who lack of imagination.
Morandotti, Alessandro

La considero un indice di intelligenza superiore e credo che la sua importanza sia davvero enorme.
Russell, Bertrand

Una delle condizioni essenziali della noia consiste nel contrasto tra le circostanze presenti e qualche altra circostanza più gradevole che si impone irresistibilmente all'immaginazione.
Russell, Bertrand


Monday, July 26, 2010

Netconceal Anonymizer 5.3.060.02 Megapload

The true meaning of the evangelical message.



Lk 10:25-37 At that time, a lawyer stood up to test Jesus: "Master, what must I do to inherit eternal life?". Jesus said, "What is written in the law? How do you read? ".
He replied: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbor as thyself." And Jesus: "You have answered correctly this do and thou shalt live." But he, desiring to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbor? ".
Jesus replied: "A man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho and fell among robbers who stripped him, beat him and went away, leaving half dead. By chance a priest was going down that road and when he saw him he passed away. Likewise a Levite, came to the place and saw him, passed on. But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, passed by saw him and had compassion.
He went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring oil and wine, and then, on his own beast and brought him to an inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii and gave them, saying: Take care of him and what more you spend, I will repay you when I return. Which of these three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the robbers? ". He said, "who showed mercy of him. " Jesus said, "Go and do likewise."


First of all, you need to make an introduction and answer a basic question from the point of view of neuroscience and metaphysics Hellenistic

LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF. You can control the love?


To answer the question "If love is a feeling, how can it be a commandment?" Take full account of PIERO STEFANI (In a conference in Milan, organized by Biblia, November 13, 2005). The speaker reminds us that "Love your neighbor as yourself" (Lev. 19:18) was già presente nel vecchio testamento. Nel precetto del Levitico, però, il verbo amare REGGE ECCEZIONALMENTE IL DATIVO. Ciò avviene perché ha a che fare con l'operatività. Il comandamento, infatti, significa: AGISCI amorosamente verso il tuo prossimo. Se traduciamo, allora, il comandamento come AGISCI caritatevolmente, lo collochiamo nell’ambito del LIBERO ARBITRIO, della VOLONTA’ e quindi della RAGIONE. Con questa interpretazione non vi è l’alibi di non riuscire, a volte, ad amare il prossimo. Con la ragione puoi importi di rispettare la legge umana o divina (ovvero agire caritatevolmente), anche se i tuoi sentimenti irrazionali inconsci sono momentaneamente contrari (come nel racconto di Dostoevskij, quando Ivan Karamazov, the troubled intellectual and atheist, Alioscia confesses to his brother, a novice in an Orthodox monastery, his inability to love our neighbor: "I have to confess something. I never could understand how we can love our neighbors. According to me are just the next you can not love, the other, far off, maybe yes, you can love. To love a person, it must be hiding, because as soon as it shows its true face, the love disappears ") .

Jesus in this passage from the Gospel, has dramatically changed the concept of "neighbor." Next, in the Jewish world, was the one to whom it was addressed to the charity. Well, for Jesus is the one next that compassion and that compassion results in charitable actions, then the next is not the one to whom I direct my love, but I am.
The evangelist Luke presents it in very well known and much loved parable of the Good Samaritan.
Let's see. "A doctor of the law", that is an expert in the other Gospels are called scribes, are the official theology of the magisterium of Israel, "he rose to ...", not to test, but" groped for Jesus. " The verb is the same as the evangelist has used on the temptations of Jesus by the devil in the desert.
Then the great defender of the law, in reality for the evangelist, is nothing but a tool of the devil.
and asks, "" Master ", that's typical of the falsity of religious people, he does not want to learn, wants to condemn him, wants to put a trap for Jesus asks him what he must do to inherit eternal life. Jesus said to him in a very detached, very ironic. Imagine that this person is one who has dedicated his entire existence to knowledge, reading and interpretation of Scripture. It asks "" What is written in the law ", and then, above all," How do you read? ", That is what you see?
Why not just read the Bible, we must also understand it. Se non si mette come primo valore il bene dell’uomo, la Bibbia può essere letta, riletta, predicata, annunziata, ma non si capirà. Il dottore della legge risponde con quello che era il credo di Israele, tratto dal Libro del Deuteronomio, cap. 6, e ci aggiunge il precetto del Levitico. Quindi all’amore a Dio con tutta l’anima, un amore assoluto, la carità per il prossimo che è relativo, “«come te stesso»”.
E Gesù dice “«Hai risposto bene; fa questo è vivrai. Ma quello, volendo giustificarsi …»”. Perché giustificarsi? All’epoca di Gesù c’era un grande dibattito tra le scuole rabbiniche su chi fosse il prossimo. Si andava the narrower concept, "the next is only one who belongs to the clan my family or my tribe," in the broadest of which included in the next stranger that lived inside Israel's borders.
So that means that this doctor wants to justify the law is for the more restrictive interpretation. And here is the wonderful parable of Jesus "" A man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho "," 800 and more meters above sea level, Jericho is at 258 meters below sea level, a few kilometers, it is a path difficult, inconvenient and a dangerous place.
The man falls into the hands of bandits who left him moribondo. In quella strada, in quelle condizioni la morte è certa, a meno che non capiti provvidenzialmente qualcuno. Infatti, provvidenzialmente – questo che qui è tradotto con ‘per caso’, significa fortunatamente e Gesù aumenta l’attenzione nei suoi ascoltatori – “«Un sacerdote scendeva»”, è importante l’indicazione che sta scendendo. Gerusalemme era la città dove c’era il tempio e Gerico una città sacerdotale.
I sacerdoti salivano a Gerusalemme per entrare in servizio presso in tempio e per una settimana dovevano essere pienamente puri per officiare di fronte al Signore, quindi non abbiamo qui un sacerdote che sale a Gerusalemme, ma che scende. E’ been in contact with the Lord for a week. E 'fully pure best could not happen.
"" going down that road and when he saw him ... "" salvation is imminent. And here's the cold shower, "" pass "." Why? E 'insensitive? E 'inhumane? No, worse: it is a religious person, and according to his religion, his law, the book of Leviticus and Numbers prevented him from touching the dead. To him, that he was a priest, also prevented from touching the corpse of their parents.
What Jesus is putting in question is a very serious matter. The law must be observed even when the cause of suffering for men? When there is conflict between divine law and man's good, what do you do? The priest has no doubts: the first is the divine law, then the good of mankind. Likewise a Levite, ie the people to worship.
And then for the man, poor man, there is no hope. Not only is there no hope, but what happens? "" A Samaritan, as he journeyed, he saw the next ", the Samaritans were enemies of the Jews. Every time we met there was a dispute escaped the dead. Here, "never mind, there is a Samaritan, who sees his enemy half dead, what will? The accopperà.
"" I saw "" and behold, resounding, "" had compassion ". The verb 'have compassion' is a technical word that indicates a divine action by which the Lord gives life to those who did not have it. We distinguish between 'have compassion', divine action, and 'have mercy', human action. Have compassion
appears three times in this Gospel, when Jesus sees the widow of Nain's dead son, he had compassion and raises when the Father of the prodigal son sees his son takes pity and gives him back his life. Well the only character who is given divine action is what is considered the most distant from God, an enemy of God, a rival of God
Jesus is answering the question "who is the believer? And 'one who obeys God by keeping His laws, or who the Father is like practicing a love like his? The answer is very clear.
"" I saw it. He went to him "," cares so even exaggerated, became a servant of this man. And here's the final question of Jesus to the lawyer. "" Which of these three '"- then we have a priest, a Levite and a Samaritan -" "do you think was coming?"
He asked "Who is my neighbor?" But Jesus, tips and asks the question "Who was neighbor." This reversal would indicate that the application is not important to love your neighbor (or have charity), but understanding what to do to become a neighbor to those in need.
And when the scribe said: "He who showed mercy on him." Jesus said unto him, 'Go and you do so "." And once again, reiterates Christ, so self-evident, that it comes to concrete action, not only of feeling, with no practical consequences for those who need it.


The proof of this interpretation is the passage of the Gospel of Matthew, 25,
which reiterated that even he will not charity, it is GRAVE PECCATO:

31 "Quando il Figlio dell'uomo verrà nella sua gloria con tutti gli angeli, allora siederà sul suo trono di gloria.
32 E tutte le nazioni saranno convocate davanti a lui. Separerà le persone come un pastore separa le pecore dalle capre,
33 e metterà le pecore alla sua destra e le capre alla sua sinistra.
34 "Poi il Re dirà a quelli della sua destra: "Venite, benedetti da mio Padre, entrate nel Regno preparato per voi fin dall'inizio del mondo.
35 Perché avevo fame, e voi mi avete dato da mangiare, avevo sete e mi avete dato dell'acqua, ero straniero e mi avete ospitato nella vostra casa,
36 ero nudo e mi avete dato dei vestiti, ero malato ed in prison and you came to me! "
37" These people just say, "Lord, when did we see you hungry and give you something to eat? or thirsty and give you something to drink?
38 When you were a stranger and you never have Help? Or were you naked and give you clothes?
39 And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you? "
40 "And the King will answer them:" When you have done for the least of these my brethren, you did for me! "
41" Then he will say to the wicked on his left, 'Depart, ye cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels;
42 because I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43
a stranger and you gave me hospitality, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and in prison and you never came to visit me! "
44" Then They will say: "Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty, stranger, or naked, sick or in prison, and do not help you?"
45 "And he responds:" Whatever you did to help even the least of these my brethren, you did not for me! "
46" And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, while the righteous will enter into eternal life. "

In conclusion, Christ not only emphasized the correct interpretation the passage of Leviticus "LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF, like ACTION to the needy and do not like feeling, but overturned the concept of neighbor. Next we are and we must amuse him day by day, to our brothers in need.

Unfortunately, in the Gospel of St. John (written around the year 100, and then when the apostle John would have theoretically about 90 years and full of Gnostic philosophy of that time), the concept described above, so clear, is misrepresented and are attributed to Christ's words "I give you a new commandment that you love one another." In reality, Christ was not even given the equivalent of "Love your neighbor as yourself, "because this phrase of Leviticus had pronounced the Scribe and Christ had the correct meaning. Christ could not say something stupid like that, because feelings can not be controlled.

The serious thing is that The Council of Nicaea, Emperor Constantine wanted to unify politically the many interpretations of the Gospel, he chose wrongly as the three canonical Synoptic Gospels (Mark, Matthew and Luke) and the Gospel (St. John's said) not merely recount the episodes, but wanted to interpret them in light of the Gnostic philosophy of that time (often twisted). When about sixty years after St. Augustine (Plotinus, Neoplatonic) was converted to Christianity, found its metaphysics far more congenial with the Gospel of St. John, and this, rather than on the other three Synoptic Gospels, he founded his theology. The irreparable harm comes to the present day, and even the doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas (metaphysics) to change this.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Wedding Card What To Say

Legato ma libero

Freedom.

The diary of an extraordinary journey across the Alps Berhault that can make us relive a series of special moments.
A special mention of this mountain climber who died while he was there where he wanted to be.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Can Monavie Help Hemochromatosis



Carry my written a few years ago in which the mountain and I were close ...

---------------------------
Week - end?

literally means the end of the week, meaning the Saturday and Sunday.
as a moment to do all those things that normally during the week we can not for reasons of time. On weekends, this great moment to live in every precious moment. It has different representations for everyone who is waiting for them to rest, those who longing to unburden himself in his favorite sport and who only a moment to pull the plug from the usual problems. But what is exactly the weekend? A moment of escape? The search for something you want during the week?
There are people who do not wish the we?
is waiting for the next live your life ... if we live for this then you are already condemned.
But the purpose is that?
get to the next w-e?
Quando non hai uno scopo, quando scopri che il progetto che ti ha portato avanti è soltanto un palliativo creato a perfezione dal tuo più intimo io per sopravvivere, allora ne cerchi un altro, più tangibile. Succede allora che subentrano una serie di meccanismi che inconsapevolmente riportano ad uno scopo sicuro, un traguardo che sai che potrai tagliare. Hai bisogno di gratificazione immediata. Ma neanche questo ti soddisfa, con il tempo capisci che non puoi continuare a fingere e allora cambi sistema, cambi l’oggetto dei tuoi desideri. Il sistema cambia, ma il perché rimane il medesimo, perché non riesco a trovare il mio scopo in questa vita? Adesso è il turno dei w-e. Vado avanti a w-e. Il prossimo mi porterà I wanted to make a race, for which I trained hard in recent months. At the end of the physicist reminded me of what was not counting on him and on myself. Some minor accident reminded me that I am not a machine, are not made to do this race. It will not change anything if I participate or not in this race, will not change either in me or in any other ....
know myself, my thoughts, my body and my limits even before attempting a comparison, I know how to overcome them deceive and how to overcome those boundaries that I relegate to a plan that does not belong.
But we can lose myself in ....
total failure in the problems trivial and all-powerful joy in overcoming an extreme limit.
And so I end up in "paranoia" for a country ... we went to that
Saturday morning wake-up brings me back to the real world detached from a dream that gave me the feeling that maybe it was more real than the alarm clock. Trying to figure out what's going on I find myself at lunch with no idea how to proceed my day, some calls me back to a way out. Programming begins, there are many things to fix, to do, to see. The air is to be able to do something sensible, the possibilities are there, the will not ....
phone calls that were expected risolte con un nulla di fatto. La programmazione è andata a quel paese. Mezzo w-e è andato a quel paese.
Insuccesso totale….
Nella settimana ho attrezzato un breve percorso per gli allenamenti con le piccozze, ora è momento per sfogarsi un po’. Mi vesto con calma, controllo che tutto sia a posto, la lentezza nel fare questi movimenti dà un sentimento tangibile di un qualcosa che tra poco accadrà, l’azione. Sono pronto, incomincio con decisione e non mollo fino a quando le mani non riescono più a stringere le piccozze, scivolo, riprendo le piccozze e riparto, il dolore agli avambracci è forte, cerco di scaricare il peso sulle gambe ma sono troppo impegnato a stringere con forza l’impugnatura planted in the wood of a tool that supported me for a few millimeters to a few meters from the ground to ensure that the head acting on a technical level. The pain is unbearable, I almost feel a sense of pleasure knowing that I am over my limit, I try to move right and flight. The wood simply because it did not take the blow dealt to me was undecided, not correct. The harness and the rope ends to prevent the ground, the rest hung and I laugh, I'm happy at the same time I feel a rage almost painful. I still have ice axes in hand, have flown with me. Do I trust my material, I count on them, if I find a good feeling it will not even try certain things. Wait for ten minutes and allotment. This time the pain appears almost immediately, I try to push as high as possible, I realize that the flight is near the rope and control. I have not recovered in the impetus to climb the rope in excess and this is equivalent to a flight that would take me almost to the ground! I try to get into the teeth from the pain of the forearms. When there is almost a foot the thought causes me to jump off a contrasting sense of security but also of will to not give up because there is little. Touch the ground, I arrived. The axes fall to the ground I have no way of knowing what is going on, I see that my hands are closed into a fist and began to make without me knowing. It hurts. I'm not worried, I know only that I asked too much from them.
Joy omnipotent.
take a few minutes I can resume full power of the hands but I realize that your forearms are ko. E 'come in the evening and tomorrow I'm going to participate in a race snowboard mountaineering and after making all go to bed, thoughtfully.
The alarm clock breaks again in my state of almost apparent reality for me to discover that true reality is sometimes unpleasant. I do not know what happened in the night but my left eye is swollen at the bottom, left half open. After a check in the mirror I decide to go back to bed to continue looking for that dream semi real. Just before falling asleep to congratulate my eye and the thin excuse that it gave me to stay a letto. Mi rialzo con le campane della chiesa e il mio pensiero volge subito alla gara che ho saltato, guardo fuori e vedo che piove, sono contento della scusa dell’occhio. Il w-e è andato, non ho fatto nulla, tranne scrivere queste righe e mi chiedo che senso potrà avere pubblicarlo sul sito. Forse nessuno, come d’altronde non ha senso aspettare un altro w-e. E’ adesso che viviamo, ogni ora, ogni minuto che passa è il nostro w-e. Ogni momento è quello giusto per fare quello che desideriamo, non aspettate il w-e o un ripiego di esso, se siete tra quelli che sanno cosa vogliono non avete nient’altro che farlo.
Ma se siete alla ricerca di uno scopo ogni momento è buono per fare un passo dalla parte giusta. L’importante è non fermarsi e lasciarsi trasportare….
Buona settimana a tutti.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

I-catcher Console-web Moniter'

La conquista del K.O.

Esilarante

Un libro che esce dagli schemi e prende in giro, in modo molto spiritoso, il mondo dell'alpinismo d'alta quota.
Da leggere.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Lord Of The Rings Hantie

Aforismi (tema sessuale)

Woody Allen
È sporco il sesso? Solo se è fatto bene.

Anatole France
Facendone un peccato il Cristianesimo ha fatto molto for sex.


Woody Allen Sex without love is an empty experience, but one of the blank is one of the best experiences.

Antonio Gramsci
In the beginning was the word. No, in the beginning was the sex.


Woody Allen Love is the answer, but while waiting for the answer, sex can suggest some good questions.

Woody Allen
The difference between love and sex, is that sex relieves tension and love causes it.

Woody Allen
not condemn masturbation. You have sex with someone who really valued!

Friedrich Nietzsche
These people abstain, it is true, but the sensuality, that bitch, jealous and sullen, looks out of everything they do.


Thursday, July 8, 2010

Maintaining An Aluminum Boat

Che caldo...

Sarà il caldo ma la voglia di scrivere è sempre meno...

Questo non significa però che non mi appunti pensieri o temi che vorrei svolgere e pubblicare!
Manca solo un pò di voglia, tutto qui.

Vi dò una bella idea, salvate l'immagine qui sotto e stampatela, tenetela a portata di mano e all'occorenza esponetela, ogni tanto bisogna farlo.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Medical Device License Ohio

Sotto gli 80...

Non di velocità... di peso!!




Finally, slowly but surely the hand of the scale (even if the scale is electronic I like a bit of amarcord) tends to decline.

should drop below 75, but by almost 85 I arrived I think I'm already very happy!

;)