The theory of the scientist in the new book "The Big Bang is derived only from the laws of physics." Many reactions of theologians, after this announcement, on the eve of the visit of Pope
From an article in "La Repubblica" on 03 September 2010:
LONDON - The world needs a Creator? "No". The peremptory answer comes from Professor Stephen Hawking, the world's most famous astrophysicist, considered by many the heir of Newton, which has as it inherited the prestigious chair at Cambridge University. In a new book coming out these days, the author of international best-seller From the Big Bang to support blacks holes, based on new theories, that "the universe may have created by themselves, may have been created from nothing" and therefore "God did not create it."
His statement yesterday occupied the entire front page of the Times of London, as a challenge, yet another, science to religion. "Just as Darwin has denied the existence of God with his theory of biological evolution of our species," said Richard Dawkins, biologist defender of atheism, "Hawking denies it now from the point of view of physics." In his most famous book, the astrophysicist had tried to explain what happened "before" the Big Bang, or the time before he was born, leaving the question unresolved. The final chapter contains an argument that some interpreted as the idea that God is not incompatible with a scientific understanding of the universe: discovering what was there before Big Bang, to reach a "complete theory" of the Universe - Hawking wrote - "would be the greatest triumph of human reason, because at that point to know the mind of God."
But in his new work, titled The Grand Design (The grand design or project) and co-written with American physicist Leonard Mlodinow, the scientist gives the answer: instead of being an unlikely event, be explained only by divine intervention, the Big Bang was "an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics." Hawking writes: "Since there is a law like gravity, the universe and may have been created by myself, from scratch. The spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something instead of nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. "In the book, the researcher also predicts that physics is close to formulate a" theory of everything ", a series of equations that can fully explain the properties of nature The discovery considered the Holy Grail of physics since Einstein.
E 'However, his assertion that God created the universe, and therefore does not exist, to raise economic and controversy. "If one has faith," says Professor George Ellis, professor of applied mathematics at the University of Cape Town, "will continue to believe that God created the Earth, the Universe, or at least turn on the light, to trigger the mechanism that has put everything in motion, before Big Bang or alleged anything that preceded it. "But the field of atheism welcomes the publication of the book by Hawking as a victory of reason and science, to be celebrated two weeks after the visit to England by Pope Benedict XVI, who will not be strongly disagree with Hawking.
In the new book, astrophysicist reveals that the reference to "the mind of God" in his previous volume on the Big Bang had been misinterpreted. Hawking has never believed that science and religion were compatible . There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, and science, which is based on observation and reasoning, "he says." And the science will win because it works. "
my remarks.
The universe requires a Creator? "NO" is also my answer, but this does not exclude that there might be a God, the great architect who has designed and set in motion the universe came out of the BIG BANG, or vice versa has created what existed before the Big Bang and which led to the Big Bang itself. And I do not think anyone will ever prove the existence or nonexistence of God
Certainly not the God described in the Bible, which operates in several stages or more stages (there is written that the creation occurred in six days and the seventh day he rested). As rightly said Stephen Hawkins everything is linked and is a logical consequence of the laws of physics (without interventions such deus ex machina that modify the processes already in place).
This means that there was a wizard, let alone in biological evolution, but free to develop according to the laws of physics, chemistry and biology.
As he said the founder of my school of thought even in his post of March 24, 2009:
http://nuoveteorie.blogspot.com/2009/03/luomo-era-in-un-progetto-intelligente.html
MAN WAS IN AN INTELLIGENT DESIGN OF GOD?
The problem posed by Pope Benedict XVI in Regensburg has its hub in genetic mutations, random and selected pure environment for the evolutionists, and the second predetermined Pope Eric Kandel, Nobel 2000, as a conceptual framework of five points, said (like many other scientists) that the genetic mutations are random and selected by the environment.
also one of the principles of quantum mechanics (The acausal ') is in support of this thesis (Besides Einstein coined the famous phrase "God does not play dice," Bohr and his friend replied, "Stop telling God Einstein what to do !"... to which Feynman said: "Not only does God play dice, but he throws them where we can not see them).
All this has nothing to do with the so-called "CHAOS", also because the meccanica quantistica sappiamo che esiste il NON LOCALISMO. Il fenomeno nasce con il teorema e la diseguaglianza di Bell, verificato sperimentalmente da Aspect e Al, che mise fine alla lunga disputa tra Bohr e Einstein sulla validità e interpretazione della meccanica quantistica. Il teorema di Bell afferma la non separabilità di alcune entità fisiche (Questo ha comportato uno sconvolgimento drammatico del metodo analitico e riduzionista occidentale). In pratica si afferma che due sistemi quantistici che hanno interagito almeno una volta non possono essere più separati, e alcune delle variabili fisiche (ad esempio gli SPIN) saranno sempre connesse tra di loro anche se i due sistemi quantistici vengono separati a distanze di miliardi di anni luce. Questo dimostra che nell'universo esistono delle connessioni significative che possono essere definite come sincroniche. Quando, ad esempio, un osservatore misura uno spin in una certa direzione automaticamente e simultaneamente lo spin della seconda particella si orienta nella direzione opposta. Questo avviene in modo istantaneo, senza la trasmissione di alcun segnale che dovrebbe sottostare, per il principio di relatività, a non superare la velocità della luce. Tutto questo può avere delle implicazioni inimmaginabili, dal momento che tutta la materia è fatta di particelle elementari che seguono le leggi della meccanica quantistica e che la materia di tutto l'universo era inizialmente, alla sua nascita, situata in una piccola zona di spazio (dalle dimensioni di una tennis ball, which then exploded in the Big Bang). From here it is very likely that all matter exists in the cosmos was once connected, and therefore, for the inseparability of Bell's theorem, it is still connected.
In conclusion, the "metaphysics synchronicity" of CG Jung might be more realistic than you think, and all the world and 10 to the 500 parallel universes (according to M theory of superstrings) could be synchronized with each other, but in a way that we can not detect.
God definitely play dice, but perhaps they are loaded dice, because there is a synchronicity or at least non-local, and this throws them where we can not see them. If
to this consideration we add a second, meaning that all subatomic particles (called strings), or bricks of the Universe, there are a limited number of types is possible, even in that HAD SOME intelligent design of God in a world of our and other parallel universes evolve sooner or later, biological beings endowed with reason and abstraction (ie, the image and likeness of God, according to the biblical concept).
This means that there has been a project manager, who HAS made changes to the initial design work in progress, so the Catholic theology of Pope Benedict XVI will come out of certain defeat, but there is nothing to prevent stato un DIO CREATORE che si sia limitato a dare l’INPUT iniziale a un progetto che, pur libero nella sua casualità, si sviluppasse secondo dei canoni DEFINITI e non INDEFINITI. Per fare un’ANALOGIA, nel gioco degli scacchi, il numero delle mosse possibili è altissimo, ma sempre limitato, e un computer del domani le potrebbe prevedere tutte e non perdere mai. Inoltre, anche partendo da tutta una serie di mosse diverse, le combinazioni dei pezzi sulla scacchiera spessissimo si ripetono (per analogia, in uno,o più, dei quasi infiniti pianeti dell'universo, può nascere o attecchire la vita, anche partendo da condizioni iniziali diverse). E qui c'è l'IMMENSA BELLEZZA E POTENZA DEL POSSIBILE GRANDE DISEGNO DI DIO: A world free to evolve, but contemporanemante reached sooner or later, and with different paths, designs budgeted (including biological intelligent and rational beings).
Meanwhile, according to the latest scientific knowledge about our universe, thanks to dark energy, is constantly expanding, so is ruled out a subsequent re-concentration of matter and a subsequent big bang. This universe will die slowly, perhaps in a few hundred billion years. And so it falls to the theory of the infinite cycle of Big Bang theory, which could exclude a Creator God.
Best wishes
Alessandra
0 comments:
Post a Comment