publishing the text from the official website ISPESL www.ispesl.it
--------------------
PRESS PRESS
ISPESL: the Institute is not a "useless institution", but essential for the safety and health of workers italiani. Con il provvedimento del Governo si chiude l’unico Ente di ricerca del Paese.
Nonostante il dimezzamento dei fondi, l’Ispesl è in grado di autofinanziarsi per più del 60% dello stanziamento concesso dallo Stato.
In relazione alle notizie di stampa si apprende che l’Ispesl (Istituto Superiore per la prevenzione e la sicurezza del Lavoro), unico Ente di ricerca del nostro Paese con vastissime competenze nel settore della prevenzione e della sicurezza dei lavoratori, nell’ambito della manovra finanziaria varata dal Consiglio dei Ministri del 25 maggio, risulterebbe soppresso.
Rimaniamo stupiti dalle notizie della soppressione e della definizione di ente inutile for the Institute for Prevention and job security (ISS).
The label, which some attributed, institution of "useless body" is offensive to all workers, besides unfounded.
ISPESL institution is not only useless, but the silence of his thirty years of daily work, through the commitment and sacrifice of the many professionals (engineers, doctors, chemists, physicists, biologists, etc.) while the scarcity of resources, ensures an irreplaceable contribution to knowledge, experience and training to the production system of our country in the sensitive area of \u200b\u200bhealth and safety of workers, providing know-how, heritage for Italy, recognized and appreciated not only in science but from all national and international organizations of employers and trade unions.
While fatal accidents per year decreased from 1600 to 1200 (to speak only of so-called dead white) this is due to all the countless initiatives Ispesl, fielded by his staff. The National
suffering since 2000 a constant and steep reduction in funds halved in recent years, from 110 million to 58 million euro, as well as a drastic reduction in staff reached retirement age (without the possibility of a physiological turn over to the hiring freeze) has not reduced its commitment to protecting the safety and health of workers. Nevertheless, the Institute has consistently used during these years to have the means and willingness to exert the most of their functions.
The Institute has, in fact, increased and extended all possible facilities that the law allows him to do, even managing to significantly increase its own revenues.
The Institute is now self-financing (35 million euro) for more than 60% of the budget that comes from the state.
And this can be considered an "institution" useless "?
who is committed and those who work on behalf of the Government and the Authorities territoriali, per le aree di Taranto, Civitavecchia, Casale Monferrato, ovvero per i gravissimi problemi del terremoto a l’Aquila, in Abruzzo?
Chi è intervenuto per la sicurezza degli insediamenti a rischio di incidente rilevante o degli impianti energetici più complessi?
Chi ha fronteggiato le emergenze nazionali al fianco delle istituzioni territoriali e nazionali (incidente Monte Bianco, nave G. Montari, Gran Sasso, ThyssenKrupp, camere iperbariche, ecc...)?
Riteniamo in conclusione che non solo l’Ispesl non sia “ente inutile”, ma che sia “utilissimo” per il nostro sistema produttivo che si finanzia per gran parte da solo.
A questo punto sarebbe utile sapere in quale logica e con quali procedure sia stata disposta la “soppressione” dell’Ispesl con lo “scioglimento” nell’Inail.
Aspettiamo una risposta.
Il personale dell’Ispesl ce la chiede. Ce lo chiedono anche i lavoratori e i familiari delle vittime sul lavoro.
Rimaniamo stupiti dalle notizie della soppressione e della definizione di ente inutile for the Institute for Prevention and job security (ISS).
The label, which some attributed, institution of "useless body" is offensive to all workers, besides unfounded.
ISPESL institution is not only useless, but the silence of his thirty years of daily work, through the commitment and sacrifice of the many professionals (engineers, doctors, chemists, physicists, biologists, etc.) while the scarcity of resources, ensures an irreplaceable contribution to knowledge, experience and training to the production system of our country in the sensitive area of \u200b\u200bhealth and safety of workers, providing know-how, heritage for Italy, recognized and appreciated not only in science but from all national and international organizations of employers and trade unions.
While fatal accidents per year decreased from 1600 to 1200 (to speak only of so-called dead white) this is due to all the countless initiatives Ispesl, fielded by his staff. The National
suffering since 2000 a constant and steep reduction in funds halved in recent years, from 110 million to 58 million euro, as well as a drastic reduction in staff reached retirement age (without the possibility of a physiological turn over to the hiring freeze) has not reduced its commitment to protecting the safety and health of workers. Nevertheless, the Institute has consistently used during these years to have the means and willingness to exert the most of their functions.
The Institute has, in fact, increased and extended all possible facilities that the law allows him to do, even managing to significantly increase its own revenues.
The Institute is now self-financing (35 million euro) for more than 60% of the budget that comes from the state.
And this can be considered an "institution" useless "?
who is committed and those who work on behalf of the Government and the Authorities territoriali, per le aree di Taranto, Civitavecchia, Casale Monferrato, ovvero per i gravissimi problemi del terremoto a l’Aquila, in Abruzzo?
Chi è intervenuto per la sicurezza degli insediamenti a rischio di incidente rilevante o degli impianti energetici più complessi?
Chi ha fronteggiato le emergenze nazionali al fianco delle istituzioni territoriali e nazionali (incidente Monte Bianco, nave G. Montari, Gran Sasso, ThyssenKrupp, camere iperbariche, ecc...)?
Riteniamo in conclusione che non solo l’Ispesl non sia “ente inutile”, ma che sia “utilissimo” per il nostro sistema produttivo che si finanzia per gran parte da solo.
A questo punto sarebbe utile sapere in quale logica e con quali procedure sia stata disposta la “soppressione” dell’Ispesl con lo “scioglimento” nell’Inail.
Aspettiamo una risposta.
Il personale dell’Ispesl ce la chiede. Ce lo chiedono anche i lavoratori e i familiari delle vittime sul lavoro.
--------------
La cosa mi lascia alquanto perplesso e mi fa girare anche un pò le balle....
0 comments:
Post a Comment